Who is Your Classroom Set Up For?

Don Sturm • September 4, 2024

As an avid reader, I often find myself immersed in books that make me think. Whether it's fiction or non-fiction, certain books have a way of challenging my perspectives in profound ways. Recently, I finished reading Quiet by Susan Cain, and it instantly joined the ranks of the most impactful books I've ever read. But what makes a book truly impactful? For me, it's when it forces me to rethink my assumptions and view the world differently. Quiet did exactly that.


For most of my life, I’ve thrived in social settings, loving the opportunities to speak in front of others and, quite frankly, being the center of attention. But Quiet opened my eyes to a reality I had never thought much about. Society, particularly in the United States, is much more friendly to the extroverted personality style. Cain talks about this as the default viewpoint.  We often celebrate and encourage behaviors that align with extroverted ideals—speaking up, being outgoing, and thinking on your feet—while undervaluing the strengths of quieter, more introspective individuals. For me, this realization was nothing short of eye-opening. However, it shouldn’t have been. I’m an extrovert, married to an introvert, with introverted kids. How was I not able to see what it was like to be an introvert in an extrovert world? 


Reflecting on this, I couldn't help but remember my early days as an educator. Between 1987 and 1991, during my training as a social studies teacher, there was a strong push to develop extroverted qualities in students. Being a good citizen meant you could speak up, engage in debates, and assert your own opinions. Naturally, I embraced this approach in my teaching. My classroom was set up to cater to extroverts, where participation often meant speaking out in discussions, engaging in debates, and delivering presentations.


I even implemented something I called the PEA grade—standing for participation, effort, and attitude—which made up 20% of a student's overall grade. My intent was positive: I wanted to encourage students to be active participants, to engage with the material, and to demonstrate their commitment through effort and a positive attitude. At the time, I believed this approach would motivate all my students to succeed.


However, looking back 34 years later, I realize that my well-intentioned approach may not have been as inclusive as I thought. My classroom, designed with extroverts in mind, likely wasn't a comfortable space for my introverted students. The emphasis on participation through speaking up and the fast-paced nature of debates may have unintentionally marginalized those who needed more time to process their thoughts or preferred to express themselves in different ways.


It saddens me to think that I might not have reached some students as effectively as I could have because they weren't comfortable participating in the way my classroom was structured. My focus on quick thinking and spontaneous debate, while beneficial for some, may have left others feeling unseen or undervalued. This realization has led me to reconsider what it means to participate in a classroom and how I, as a technology/instructional coach, can help others create an environment that supports all students, regardless of their personality type.


Today, I believe it's essential to design classrooms that encourage introverts to share their ideas in authentic ways that feel more comfortable while also helping extroverts appreciate the value of thoughtful, deliberate communication. For instance, providing opportunities for written reflections or small group discussions can allow introverted students to contribute in ways that play to their strengths. Meanwhile, encouraging extroverts to step back and listen more actively can help them develop a deeper understanding of the material and their peers' perspectives.


As educators, we must continuously learn, reflect, and adapt our teaching practices to ensure that our classrooms are inclusive spaces where all students can thrive. This means challenging our assumptions and being mindful of the diverse ways students engage with learning. So, I leave you with this question: Who is your classroom set up for? Are you creating an environment where every student—introverted or extroverted—feels valued and able to contribute?

Don Sturm is starting his 34th year in education. He was a high school social studies teacher for 23 years before becoming the technology integration specialist for Morton CUSD#709. While he is passionate about all things education, his main interest is helping educators reflect on their classroom practices. He is the co-host of two podcasts, Through the Educational Looking Glass, which focuses on teaching and learning, and CareU, which focuses on helping those raising kids be more intentional in their practices. 


Don has been married for 36 years and has two grown children. He loves to travel and read.
 


RECENT ARTICLES

By Betsy Monke October 29, 2025
This blog, written by an IDEA Mini-Grant recipient, discusses the idea behind using robots during reading lessons to support literacy and increase reading scores.
By Emily Vertino October 22, 2025
ChatGPT, a form of generative Artificial Intelligence, more commonly referred to as AI, popularized amongst students my freshman year of high school. My at-the-time English teacher was the first to notice that all of a sudden, freshmen—who had never taken a high school-level English course—wrote as advanced as a college professor. He pointed out that students who showed high school-level hand-written papers were able to properly use an em dash and focused on parallel structuring solely on their online assignments, a feat he had not seen in freshmen before. It became natural for teachers—from freshmen classes to senior classes—to connect that students using emdashes or specific words—delve, deep understanding, crucial, elevate, resonate, enhance, tapestry, foster, endeavor, enlighten—had used AI in their paper. After a few months of teachers reporting that students began scoring exceptionally well on papers, my school implemented an application called TurnItIn, ironically, another generative AI that reviewed paper and scanned for “proof” of AI generated text. The issue started once TurnItIn accused students who properly incorporated a citation into an essay plagiarized the text, ignoring all credit given to the original author and the research done by the student. Needless to say, we switched back to teachers reading papers and discussing with the students themselves if there was suspicion of AI incorporation and my school made a policy about “AI Academic Dishonesty”. Even amongst my peers in the classes with the highest rigor, there are countless kids who incorporate AI into their school work. Be it through having ChatGPT solve their calculus problem or Chemistry problem, AI is widely incorporated, which causes a noticeable shift in their critical thinking capabilities. Rather than spending thirty minutes struggling through a derivative problem on their own, they immediately refer to having ChatGPT solve it and copy the answer down, depriving them of critical understanding of the problem and the method used to solve it. General conversation is shifting too—my hallways are full of students misusing words or bragging about how ChatGPT landed them an A in a specific class. This isn’t to say I’m against AI—because I truly believe proper use of AI can be more beneficial than harmful—but as it is now, generative AI devices are damaging the development of my peer’s brains and there are dozens studies showing that generative AI, specifically Elon Musk’s Grok, is ruining the ecosystem of Memphis. I also find that the use of the resources around me has gradually decreased. When I was a freshman, my school used a center court to hold a resource center for all subjects—on top of every teacher having office hours for an additional 30 minutes after every day—and it quickly became a hot spot for students. I write fanfiction during my free time so I was actively inside the court, having English teachers proofread my work and discussing my ideas for the next scenes. I also went in to simply talk to teachers, but that’s beside the point. Each day I was in our resource court, it was filled with students coming in for support—be it math, English, science, history, or a language—and truly working on bettering their understanding of the subject. However, now, as a senior, we only have a math resource center (MRC) that operates full-time and a science resource center that operates during the first 40 minutes of a class. My school no longer has an English resource center for students that need help and for those who do, even office hours are a 50/50. As mentioned before, teachers stay for 30 minutes after school—with the exception of teachers who supervise clubs or sports—which is far too short for English teachers that have dozens of students coming in for English support. A select number of teachers introduced an appointment scheduling simply because of how busy their office hours are, while other teachers have students who only come in the day before a summative. The teachers I know became teachers because of their love for helping students, yet my peers are dismissing all help from their teachers in favor of ChatGPT, who isn’t even correct 100% of the time. This phenomenon occurs with reading, too. I’m an avid reader—most of my favorite novels have multiple volumes with hundreds of chapters (my all-time favorite has 1,400 chapters for the first book alone; the second book has another thousand), and a growing issue I’ve noticed as AI grows is that my peers use AI to summarize documents. For example, Connected Papers has been recommended to me by my closest friends and once I googled it, I found that it uses AI to web-browse for articles similar to a paper currently being read and labels key points that correlate to your current article. AI is useful; essentially, AI isn’t inherently harmful and there are proper uses for it, but the misuse of AI continuously outweighs the benefits. In the above instance, having a resource capable of easily accumulating sources in a similar field of interest shaves off time spent scouring online and leaves that time for additional revisions, which is beneficial, but the most common use of AI is completion, not assistance, when it should be the opposite.
By Member Engagement Committee September 10, 2025
IDEA has launched a pilot Slack community to provide its members with a space to create consistent and meaningful connections with like-minded peers.