Unearthing Hidden Stories: The Importance of Teaching Missing Narratives in History

Abeer Ramadan-Shinnawi, MEd • February 14, 2024

In her famous TED Talk, Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie warns of the danger of a single story. She explains how growing up, she only read books about British and American characters, and it wasn't until she read African literature that she saw people who looked like her and had similar experiences. This single story of the world can lead to stereotypes, misunderstandings, and a limited understanding of the complexities of different cultures and histories.


Similarly, the dominant narrative in history has been written by those in power, often leaving out the perspectives and experiences of marginalized communities. This has resulted in a distorted and incomplete understanding of our collective past. By reclaiming history and teaching missing narratives, we can break free from the single story and gain a more nuanced and accurate understanding of our past.


There is a saying in the history sphere of teaching that teaching the non-dominant history is called “teaching hard history.” I believe that this is not “hard” but “necessary” history. History is often described as a collection of stories from the past that helps us understand how our world has evolved. However, traditional history education has often overlooked, marginalized or even erased certain narratives, leaving behind stories that are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of our past. The importance of teaching missing narratives in history provides a foundation on building a more inclusive society. 


History education should not be about memorizing facts but about developing critical thinking skills. When we teach missing narratives, students are encouraged to question the dominant narratives they have been taught. They learn to analyze sources, consider multiple perspectives, and form their own opinions—a skill that is invaluable in today's world.


For many students, they do not see themselves in the history curriculum that is being taught, therefore, aligning curriculum that reflects student lived experiences provides a culturally responsive lens. Culturally responsive teaching is an approach that recognizes the importance of incorporating students' cultural backgrounds and experiences into the curriculum. By teaching missing narratives, we can make history more relevant and relatable to students' lives. This can help students see the connections between the past and the present, and understand how historical events have shaped the world we live in today.


Teaching missing narratives in history allows us to broaden our perspectives and gain a more holistic view of human experiences. When we only focus on dominant narratives, we miss out on the stories of communities, individuals, and events that have shaped our world. By including these missing narratives, we not only honor the voices that have been silenced but also enrich our understanding of history. 


Many missing narratives in history are a result of historical injustices and systemic biases. By teaching these narratives, we acknowledge past wrongs and work towards correcting them. It's a step towards justice and reconciliation with the past, helping to ensure that such injustices are not repeated. History is not just about the past; it also shapes the present and future by inspiring change. Students who learn about the struggles and achievements of those who have been marginalized are more likely to become advocates for justice and equality. History is not just a collection of facts and dates; it is a reflection of the human experience. When we teach missing narratives, we encourage empathy and compassion. Students can better relate to the struggles, triumphs, and challenges faced by people from diverse backgrounds. Students can also learn how groups overcame injustice that led to the creation of laws or policies that impact their lives today. This empathy can translate into a more compassionate and understanding society.


Our society is becoming increasingly diverse, and it is essential that our history education reflects this diversity. Teaching missing narratives ensures that all students can see themselves represented in history, fostering a sense of belonging and pride in one's heritage. Students can also find connections between their own communities and those of other communities and how we build on the knowledge and strengths of each other to create the larger harmonious collective of society. 


Incorporating missing narratives into history education is not only about rewriting history but about enriching it. It's about acknowledging the stories that have been ignored, silenced, or forgotten and giving them the place they deserve. By doing so, we create a more inclusive, empathetic, and informed society—one that can learn from its past to build a better future.

Abeer Ramadan-Shinnawi is a Palestinian American educator of 20+ years. She has held leadership positions in the U.S. in various school and district settings.  Abeer is a veteran middle school social studies teacher who has used her upbringing as a child of immigrants to help connect students, schools, and communities. She has worked with schools, cultural institutions, and publishers throughout her career to provide curriculum, content, and activities that reflect BIPOC students and teachers. Ramadan-Shinnawi started her own education consulting business in 2019 called Altair Education Consulting out of a need to create learning pathways about Muslim and Arab youth for all educators but also provide educational materials, professional development, and speaking sessions about amplifying the voice and history of the Arab/Muslim American communities. 

RECENT ARTICLES

By Betsy Monke October 29, 2025
This blog, written by an IDEA Mini-Grant recipient, discusses the idea behind using robots during reading lessons to support literacy and increase reading scores.
By Emily Vertino October 22, 2025
ChatGPT, a form of generative Artificial Intelligence, more commonly referred to as AI, popularized amongst students my freshman year of high school. My at-the-time English teacher was the first to notice that all of a sudden, freshmen—who had never taken a high school-level English course—wrote as advanced as a college professor. He pointed out that students who showed high school-level hand-written papers were able to properly use an em dash and focused on parallel structuring solely on their online assignments, a feat he had not seen in freshmen before. It became natural for teachers—from freshmen classes to senior classes—to connect that students using emdashes or specific words—delve, deep understanding, crucial, elevate, resonate, enhance, tapestry, foster, endeavor, enlighten—had used AI in their paper. After a few months of teachers reporting that students began scoring exceptionally well on papers, my school implemented an application called TurnItIn, ironically, another generative AI that reviewed paper and scanned for “proof” of AI generated text. The issue started once TurnItIn accused students who properly incorporated a citation into an essay plagiarized the text, ignoring all credit given to the original author and the research done by the student. Needless to say, we switched back to teachers reading papers and discussing with the students themselves if there was suspicion of AI incorporation and my school made a policy about “AI Academic Dishonesty”. Even amongst my peers in the classes with the highest rigor, there are countless kids who incorporate AI into their school work. Be it through having ChatGPT solve their calculus problem or Chemistry problem, AI is widely incorporated, which causes a noticeable shift in their critical thinking capabilities. Rather than spending thirty minutes struggling through a derivative problem on their own, they immediately refer to having ChatGPT solve it and copy the answer down, depriving them of critical understanding of the problem and the method used to solve it. General conversation is shifting too—my hallways are full of students misusing words or bragging about how ChatGPT landed them an A in a specific class. This isn’t to say I’m against AI—because I truly believe proper use of AI can be more beneficial than harmful—but as it is now, generative AI devices are damaging the development of my peer’s brains and there are dozens studies showing that generative AI, specifically Elon Musk’s Grok, is ruining the ecosystem of Memphis. I also find that the use of the resources around me has gradually decreased. When I was a freshman, my school used a center court to hold a resource center for all subjects—on top of every teacher having office hours for an additional 30 minutes after every day—and it quickly became a hot spot for students. I write fanfiction during my free time so I was actively inside the court, having English teachers proofread my work and discussing my ideas for the next scenes. I also went in to simply talk to teachers, but that’s beside the point. Each day I was in our resource court, it was filled with students coming in for support—be it math, English, science, history, or a language—and truly working on bettering their understanding of the subject. However, now, as a senior, we only have a math resource center (MRC) that operates full-time and a science resource center that operates during the first 40 minutes of a class. My school no longer has an English resource center for students that need help and for those who do, even office hours are a 50/50. As mentioned before, teachers stay for 30 minutes after school—with the exception of teachers who supervise clubs or sports—which is far too short for English teachers that have dozens of students coming in for English support. A select number of teachers introduced an appointment scheduling simply because of how busy their office hours are, while other teachers have students who only come in the day before a summative. The teachers I know became teachers because of their love for helping students, yet my peers are dismissing all help from their teachers in favor of ChatGPT, who isn’t even correct 100% of the time. This phenomenon occurs with reading, too. I’m an avid reader—most of my favorite novels have multiple volumes with hundreds of chapters (my all-time favorite has 1,400 chapters for the first book alone; the second book has another thousand), and a growing issue I’ve noticed as AI grows is that my peers use AI to summarize documents. For example, Connected Papers has been recommended to me by my closest friends and once I googled it, I found that it uses AI to web-browse for articles similar to a paper currently being read and labels key points that correlate to your current article. AI is useful; essentially, AI isn’t inherently harmful and there are proper uses for it, but the misuse of AI continuously outweighs the benefits. In the above instance, having a resource capable of easily accumulating sources in a similar field of interest shaves off time spent scouring online and leaves that time for additional revisions, which is beneficial, but the most common use of AI is completion, not assistance, when it should be the opposite.
By Member Engagement Committee September 10, 2025
IDEA has launched a pilot Slack community to provide its members with a space to create consistent and meaningful connections with like-minded peers.